11/3/2017
Posted by 

PC Aviator Australia Flight Simulation Forums. The place to post links to your favourite aviation videos, videos you have made yourself, or to any interesting You. Tube videos you have come across related to aviation or flight simulation. The ultimate flight simulator site for FSX, FS2004, XPlane, Prepar3D and more. Thousands of searchable flight simulation file downloads, message forums, photo. Live the ultimate pilot experience Featuring ultradetailed aircraft, a realistic flight model, and one of the most advanced weather systems in flight simulation. Welcome to SimSamurai. We are a small team of professional pilots dedicated to helping the worlds aviation community, recreational pilots, and flight simulator. Justice Department Tries to Take Microsoft Email Warrant Fight to Supreme Court. The US Department of Justice is attempting to take its long running legal battle with Microsoft over access to emails stored on foreign servers to the Supreme Court. After several delays, the Justice Department tonight filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to take its case. An appeals court previously ruled in favor of Microsoft, finding the the Justice Department couldnt use a warrant to obtain messages from one of the companys overseas data centers and would have to request the data through an international treaty process instead. If the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case, its decision will have wide ranging affects on the way the tech industry stores user data and the way law enforcement accesses it, both in the US and abroad. But if the Supreme Court doesnt take the case, the appeals court ruling will stand, and the tech industrys lobbying effort to get Congress to change a 3. It seems backward to keep arguing in court when there is positive momentum in Congress toward better law for everyone. The DOJs position would put businesses in impossible conflict of law situations and hurt the security, jobs, and personal rights of Americans, Microsoft president and chief legal officer Brad Smith said in a statement. Red Hat Kickstart Post Install Script Setup. How did we get here The battle between Microsoft and DOJ has been raging since 2. Electronic Communications Privacy Act governing law enforcement access to user data. The Justice Department was investigating a drug case, and wanted access to a suspects emails, so it served Microsoft with a warrant for the data. However, Microsoft has data centers all around the world, and some of these emails happened to be stored on a server in Irelandbeyond the reach of a US issued warrant. To get access to data thats stored in other countries, US law enforcement is supposed to go through the tedious Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty, or MLAT, process. Microsoft Flight Simulator Future Plans' title='Microsoft Flight Simulator Future Plans' />Microsoft Flight Simulator Future PlansMicrosoft Flight Simulator Future PlansAbout the Versions of the XPlane Simulator. XPlane can be used in a wide array of situations, ranging from home use to commercial flight training. Boeing is researching the possibility of commercialpassenger jets that will rely on artificial intelligence rather than pilots. Initial experimental flights, without. Matthew Garcia became interested in aviation at the age of 12 when he installed Microsoft Flight Simulator X on his computer. He was instantly bitten by the bug and. Early Access edition of Dovetail Games Flight Sim World standalone sim on sale now from the Just Flight websiteIt takes roughly 1. Justice Department didnt want to wait that long. Microsoft fought the warrant, arguing that ECPA doesnt apply to international data. ECPA became law in 1. After losing its case in a lower court, Microsoft appealed to the Second Circuit, which ruled last July that the Justice Department couldnt justify its use of a warrant to acquire data stored overseas with ECPA. The Second Circuit declined in January to re hear the case, but called on Congress to step in and fix the broken provisions of ECPA. The legal standards at play in the case have been left behind by technology and are overdue for a congressional revision, Second Circuit Judge Susan L. Carney wrote in the decision. The Justice Department indicated that it might appeal the case to the Supreme Courtit had asked the Supreme Court twice for more time to file a petition requesting that the Court hear the case. Why does this case matter Even though the internet feels like an ephemeral tangle of bits that vanishes when you lock your phone screen, all that data has to live somewhere. Server farms all over the world play host to your sleeping emails, messages, and Snaps. This is why everyone says that annoying thing about how the cloud doesnt exist, its just other peoples computers. The outcome of Microsofts case will shape the future of law when it comes to the cloudand not just in the US. The case has international implications, and thats why many other tech companies are watching closely to see how it turns out. There are lots of good reasons to scatter data around the globe whenever an earthquake finally heaves Silicon Valley into the ocean, youll presumably still want to be able to check your DMs. Server farms also take up a lot of space and can benefit from the surrounding climate. Irelands cool and misty weather makes it particularly hospitable for server farms, and Googles not the only company storing data there. But while this kind of data distribution is healthy for the survival of infrastructure, it causes problems for law enforcement agencies that want to read through a suspects emails. Crazy shit has started to happen as law enforcement agencies demand that tech companies hand over data stored in other countries. If the US can snatch foreign data with impunity, other governments will want to do the sameand companies like Microsoft wont have good legal standing to refuse. Is Weight Ers The Best Weight Loss Program there. Thats very bad news for US consumers privacy. In an effort to protect their own citizens data, some governments are considering proposals that would order companies to store data locally. This kind of data localization is intended to evade overreaching law enforcement agencies from other countriesIreland, for instance, doesnt want US courts to access its citizens data without its say sobut it doesnt really take into account the way data is transmitted and stored on the modern web. By using a U. S. warrant to seek digital information overseas, law enforcement effectively sidesteps the host of international agreements that already govern how it may access evidence located abroad, Microsofts Smith testified before a subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee in May. The short circuiting of these agreements risks undermining the international collaboration that is a cornerstone for the protection of public safety. Allowing US agencies to enforce warrants outside US borders would sow distrust among international users, tech companies argue. Other companies would gain an advantage if they were seen as more privacy protective. Conflicting laws also put tech employees in the awkward position of having to decide which countrys laws theyre going to break. Those conflicts put technology companies in the impossible position of choosing which countrys law to obey and which to violate, Smith testified. While this may seem trivial to some, I can attest that the threat of significant fines or imprisonmentin the United States and in other countries where we operateare very real. If the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case, it could reverse the Second Circuit decision and order Microsoft to comply with the warrant, a move that Microsoft and other major tech companies believe would be devastating for their businesses. What happens now The Supreme Court now gets to decide whether or not it wants to hear the case. It gets between 7,0. SCOTUSblog, so it might pass on this. But Microsofts case raises the kind of unresolved legal issue that could be appealing to the court. Whether or not the Supreme Court takes up the case, tech lobbying efforts on ECPA are going to intensify. Tech giants like Apple, Amazon, and Google, as well as civil liberties organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation, supported Microsofts lawsuit in the Second Circuit. These companies would much rather see the issue decided by Congress than the courts. Microsoft and Google have put forth proposals for how theyd like to see Congress update the 3. Since the Second Circuit declined to re hear the case earlier this year, tech companies have upped their lobbying efforts, pressing Congress to undertake a revision of ECPA. Letting the Supreme Court handle it is risky a negative SCOTUS decision would push the industry back to where it started in 2. At its heart, the case illustrates how technology has evolved over the past three decadesbut the law has not, Smith said during his Senate testimony in May.